Local Versus Central IRBs: What’s the Difference?
Central and local IRBs share the same research oversight goals, but NIH’s single IRB mandate challenges local IRBs to adapt their broader responsibilities.
Central and local IRBs share the same research oversight goals, but NIH’s single IRB mandate challenges local IRBs to adapt their broader responsibilities.
As clinical research sites face more challenges than perhaps ever before, it’s increasingly important to provide sites with proper support
In clinical research, institutional review boards (IRBs) a vital role in ensuring participant rights and ethical standards are upheld throughout the trial.
For the past two years, the clinical research industry has seen an acceleration in staff shifting to a remote, work
In medical device research, the determination of “significant risk” or “nonsignificant risk” is sometimes confusing, especially for those new to
The most recent Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) guidelines released by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) include a new Core
With diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts currently at the forefront of the research community’s collective mind, we’re also seeing increased
As many research organizations are becoming more patient-centric and adapting to technological advancements and remote requirements, they are re-designing the
Effective billing compliance starts with understanding routine costs, extended coverage, and administrative fees to avoid costly errors in clinical trials.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of robust emergency preparedness for HRPPs, ensuring research continuity and participant protection during crises.
Switching from paper to eSource in clinical trials enhances data accuracy, reduces errors, and boosts organization, offering more efficient study management.
A clinical research trial can only be as strong its participant population, but it’s challenging to find eligible patients.