BLOG

Digital Health, COVID-19, and the Evolution of Clinical Trials

March 22, 2021

 

The COVID-19 pandemic has driven transformative changes across industries, and clinical research is no exception. While digital health technologies were emerging before the pandemic, COVID-19 significantly accelerated their adoption, reshaping the way clinical trials are conducted. In this post, we explore how the pandemic has become a catalyst for integrating digital health into clinical trials, the benefits it brings, and the challenges still needing to be addressed.

COVID-19: A Catalyst for Change in Clinical Research

Even before the pandemic, clinical trials faced challenges, particularly around recruitment and retention. Low participation rates have long hindered drug development, slowing down progress and leading to underpowered studies failing to meet endpoints. This presents ethical concerns as it may mean participants undergo the risks and burdens of research without contributing valuable data.

The pandemic, however, brought clinical research to the forefront of public consciousness. Suddenly, participation in clinical trials, especially those for COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, became a widely discussed topic. This newfound awareness presents an opportunity to improve recruitment and retention in clinical research, particularly through digital health technology integration.

The Role of Digital Health in Overcoming Trial Barriers

Digital health, particularly through the use of mobile health technologies and telemedicine, has helped break down some of the longstanding barriers to clinical trial participation. Historically, participants were required to visit clinical sites for physical exams and assessments – a model excluding those unable to take time off work, find childcare, or travel long distances. However, technologies enabling remote monitoring and virtual visits have made trials more accessible.

For example, mobile health devices now allow participants to monitor their blood pressure or complete assessments from home. This not only reduces the burden on participants but also democratizes access to clinical trials, allowing a broader, more diverse population to participate. These technologies can improve patient-centered research by enabling real-time data collection, potentially capturing data points potentially missed during sporadic in-person visits.

Trusting the Data: Challenges of Virtual Trial Technologies

While digital health technologies offer significant benefits, they also raise concerns, particularly around data integrity and reliability. One major challenge is ensuring the accuracy of data collected remotely through devices like smartphones or smartwatches. Traditionally, clinical sites rely on calibrated, maintained equipment operated by trained professionals. When participants use personal devices at home, there’s a risk that data might not be as reliable. Clinical trial sponsors must ensure the data collected remotely can still meet the rigorous standards required for regulatory approval by bodies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency EMA.

From an institutional review board (IRB) perspective, these challenges translate into questions about the risk-benefit ratio of research involving digital health tools. If data quality is compromised, the research may not yield valid results, potentially exposing participants to unnecessary risks without the prospect of meaningful outcomes.

Privacy Concerns in the Digital Health Landscape

Beyond data integrity, digital health technologies also raise concerns about privacy and confidentiality. Devices such as wearables and smartphones often collect vast amounts of personal data, including sensitive information like location, heart rate, sleep patterns, and more. It’s crucial participants fully understand the privacy implications of using these devices in a clinical trial setting. IRBs must ensure protocols include robust protections for participant data, preventing breaches and safeguarding confidentiality.

Ensuring Fair Access and Justice in Digital Health Trials

Another ethical consideration with the adoption of digital health in clinical trials is ensuring equitable access. Not all potential participants own the necessary devices or have reliable internet access, which could inadvertently exclude economically disadvantaged individuals from research opportunities. To mitigate this, some trials provide participants with devices for the duration of the study. Offering flexible participation options—such as the choice between in-person visits and virtual monitoring—can also help ensure digital health enhances, rather than limits, access to research.

The Future of Digital Health in Clinical Trials

The changes brought about by COVID-19 are unlikely to be reversed. Virtual trial technologies are likely here to stay, and regulatory agencies like the FDA have shown flexibility in supporting their use. However, these agencies will likely require technologies meet strict standards for data integrity and validation before they are widely accepted for all types of clinical research.

While fully virtual trials may be feasible for some later-stage studies, such as phase IV or post-marketing trials, many trials will continue to require a hybrid approach. Early-stage trials, particularly those involving complex procedures or medical imaging, will still rely on in-person interactions. The future of clinical trials will likely involve a combination of traditional site-based visits and remote technologies, offering greater flexibility for participants and potentially improving recruitment and retention.

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the integration of digital health into clinical research, presenting opportunities to improve access, data collection, and participant engagement. However, challenges related to data integrity, privacy, and equitable access remain. As the industry continues to adapt, sponsors, contract research organizations (CROs), and IRBs must work together to ensure digital health technologies are used in a way so benefits are maximized and risks are minimized, ultimately enhancing the quality and efficiency of clinical trials.

Meghan Hosely

Meghan Hosely

Marketing Content Manager

Meghan Hosely creates educational content for Advarra, such as blogs, eBooks, white papers, and more.

View all posts

Advarra to Your Inbox

Be the first to know about
new content, products, and
services from Advarra. Sign up for our newsletter and stay in the loop!

Scroll to Top